Swipe across the table, or focus this panel and use the arrow keys to compare.
| Decision | Break-fix engagement | Managed IT engagement |
|---|---|---|
| Trigger | A specific issue or request | Ongoing service scope and priorities |
| Ownership | Defined for the individual job | Agreed across recurring operations |
| Maintenance | Scheduled or requested separately | Included when specified in the service plan |
| Cost discussion | Per incident or project | Recurring scope plus clearly separated changes |
| Planning | Usually a separate engagement | Review cadence and roadmap can be included |
01 / THE PRACTICAL DIFFERENCE
Start with the consequence of an interruption
Identify which employees and workflows are affected when systems stop working. A business with a simple environment and occasional work may favor individual projects. A team with recurring dependencies needs to decide who watches the whole operation between incidents.
02 / THE PRACTICAL DIFFERENCE
Compare scope before comparing invoices
List support hours, devices, security responsibilities, backup work, vendor coordination, and project exclusions. Ask each provider to explain who performs each task and how changes are approved. A recurring invoice alone does not establish comprehensive coverage.
03 / THE PRACTICAL DIFFERENCE
Ask for evidence of the operating relationship
Look for an understandable inventory, documented escalation route, review agenda, and owned improvement list. During discovery, agree how completed work and unresolved risks will be presented to leadership.
04 / THE PRACTICAL DIFFERENCE
Build a starting point
Count the people who need support, then add separate infrastructure, NOC, recovery, and project requirements where appropriate. Our team reviews overlap before preparing the sales order.